• A Blog from Motorola Mobility Home

    On broadband: video, voice, data, wireless and more!

    Click here

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • 2011 SCTE Show

    See what Motorola announced at the 2011 SCTE Show!

    Click here
  • Feed

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • YouTube

New NCTA Proposal on Must-Carry Channels/DTV Transition

ncta-dtv.jpg

I wrote last month about the “must carry” debate going on between the FCC and the cable industry. Now there’s more to add to the story. The NCTA has proposed that cable companies multicast local digital channels in digital and analog for three years beyond the DTV transition deadline of February 17th, 2009. Cable companies would prefer to drop analog broadcasts of this local content as soon as possible to reclaim more bandwidth, but they’re clearly willing to negotiate. Will the FCC back down from its proposal for continual multicasting until cable systems are 100% digital, which will take much longer than three years?

Here’s a look at what’s at stake. A number of public television stations have gone digital since 1998 (336 as of a year ago) and have started broadcasting on multiple digital channels instead of a single analog channel each. More channels means more content, much of it local. Looking at my own public television station, for example, I can see that WHYY will be broadcasting films produced by students from Temple University on one of its digital channels this evening.

Public television content is meant to be free to the public, so the FCC maintains that cable should broadcast it in analog as long as it has analog customers. After February 2009, consumers without any type of paid TV will have to be digital viewers – with either new digital televisions or converter boxes – so they will see any local digital content. But some cable customers will still be analog, and therefore will be paying for television, but, without cable multicasting, will not be able to access local digital content.

This is a gnarly dilemma. Public TV stations want to make their new content available. Cable operators don’t want to be saddled with the bandwidth burden of broadcasting additional channels in analog. And consumers for the most part don’t know about the issue at all and couldn’t care less.

Here’s a way to sum it up simply with a familiar theme. When there’s more bandwidth available, we make more content. And the more content we make, the more bandwidth we want.

3 Responses

  1. [...] UPDATE: Multichannel News reports that the public meeting never happened because FCC leaders were “stuck in negotiations all day Tuesday.”  The hold-up is primarily debate over the digital must-carry rules. [...]

  2. [...] how important the digital “must-carry” issue has been for the cable industry? The popularity of articles on the topic may be an indicator. CTAM [...]

  3. [...] transition? The original impetus behind moving to all-digital television was a regulatory push to reclaim broadcast channels for public/civic use. However, with the rapid growth of HDTV, on-demand television and streaming video on the Web, [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: