<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stream High-Def Content Wirelessly at Home – New Consortium Says It Will Happen in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://connectedhome2go.com/2008/07/23/stream-high-def-content-wirelessly-at-home-%e2%80%93-new-consortium-says-it-will-happen-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://connectedhome2go.com/2008/07/23/stream-high-def-content-wirelessly-at-home-%e2%80%93-new-consortium-says-it-will-happen-in-2009/</link>
	<description>A Motorola Blog on Video, Voice, Data, Wireless and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://connectedhome2go.com/2008/07/23/stream-high-def-content-wirelessly-at-home-%e2%80%93-new-consortium-says-it-will-happen-in-2009/#comment-3232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connectedhome2go.wordpress.com/?p=922#comment-3232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely, you can prioritize the low-frequency components of the video higher than the higher-frequency components.  Doing that on purpose is called requantization in the compressed domain...

Since there really isn&#039;t any uncompressed HD video out there, couldn&#039;t we just leave the video compressed and transport it wirelessly that way?  HDTV antenna signals are MPEG-2, BD&#039;s are MPEG-2 or h.264 or WMV, cable signals are MPEG-2, satellite are MPEG-2 or h.264, etc.  Of course that would mean developing every box with yet another connector on it, so that you could output the compressed signal, and require the TV to handle all the different codec types etc.  Probably not workable at this point.  Too bad this wasn&#039;t an option over DVI/HDMI...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, you can prioritize the low-frequency components of the video higher than the higher-frequency components.  Doing that on purpose is called requantization in the compressed domain&#8230;</p>
<p>Since there really isn&#8217;t any uncompressed HD video out there, couldn&#8217;t we just leave the video compressed and transport it wirelessly that way?  HDTV antenna signals are MPEG-2, BD&#8217;s are MPEG-2 or h.264 or WMV, cable signals are MPEG-2, satellite are MPEG-2 or h.264, etc.  Of course that would mean developing every box with yet another connector on it, so that you could output the compressed signal, and require the TV to handle all the different codec types etc.  Probably not workable at this point.  Too bad this wasn&#8217;t an option over DVI/HDMI&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Media Bytes</title>
		<link>http://connectedhome2go.com/2008/07/23/stream-high-def-content-wirelessly-at-home-%e2%80%93-new-consortium-says-it-will-happen-in-2009/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digital Media Bytes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connectedhome2go.wordpress.com/?p=922#comment-3231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stream High-Def Content Wirelessly at Home: Media Experiences 2 Go [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stream High-Def Content Wirelessly at Home: Media Experiences 2 Go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

